One of many of his gross errors is about the secondary system K’ traveling at speed, away from the stationary system K, and a wave (of light I guess?) is emitted from it. According to einstein, the wave would emit in a circle, and he throws at a reader Lorentz transformation, as his own and as a proof. However, when we actually look at the Lorentz transformation, and calculate it correctly, it turns out that the function produces an ellipse, not a circle, as “genius” claims.

What more one wants? The twins? If one twin travels through a space with the speed of light, all that will ever happen is that he will arrive back to the Earth VERY quickly. S/he won’t be any younger than her/his sibling.

By defeating the SR, his GR fails as well. To claim anything else is to admit stupidity. I am pointing my finger at greene as I find him especially pathetic, but hawking and the rest are equally undeserving of their doctorates.

]]>you wrote in ambsrelativity.pdf in capture 3.2, p. 34, that the Maxwell equitations are not invariant to the Galileian tranformation. Why?

Sinceraly

Wolfgang Lange ]]>