I think, the only way to know, how light travels (spread, propagate) is, to test and measure it. My guess is, that light spreads as a perfect sphere from not accelerated light sources. The not accelerated light source stays always in the center of the spreading sphere.

In the case of an accelerated light source it should be another way. But if we broke down the time to little peaces, we can say that any position of the light source produces a sphere at its own. But the light source doesn’t stay in the centers. So the hull curve should look like a conus with the light source at the tip – and the speed of light in relation to the light source cannot have the value c.

Tell that to einstein. He started with Lorentz transformation. And he never understood it to begin with. Take his formulas and calculate them for any speed above 100 000km/s, I suggest 250 000km/s for greater clarity, and then plot the coordinates onto an A3 paper. A3 for your own benefit. The size of the ellipsoid instead of a “perfect” sphere should tell you how wrong you and einstein are.

]]>I would just add to your comment that einstein’s mathematical formulas do not work at all. einstein said in his first publication, the special relativity “theory”, that the transmitted signal travels in the shape of a “perfect” sphere from both the stationary and the moving system. Ignorant that he was, he never managed to actually calculate his own formulas and examine result – experimenting as a scientific tool was a foreign concept for the ignorant that he was.

Had he tried, he would have discovered that when his “moving system” travels at speeds above 100 000km/s his “perfect sphere” is actually a perfect ellipsoid. It is so at any speed, it should be said, no matter how small. It is just that one sees the difference better when the coordinates are plotted on a paper, with the high speeds.

Or, in other words, the ignorant was defeated by his own mathematical formulas.

But the real problem are the believers who never question anything, choosing instead to believe blindly, even in science. The fundamental scientific postulate is to question everything until the facts are established and answers are found, based exclusively on scientifically confirmed facts.

Theories are unproven and unconfirmed speculations and are open to criticism, questioning and rebuttal. Turning einstein’s pseudo theories into an untouchable belief is merely a new form of religion. Not a science.

]]>See for more my homepage https://albrecht-storz.homepage.t-online.de/ (in German)

English Abstract:

Einstein and the Special Theory of Relativity

Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity is to be followed by various, very unusual consequences.

Consequences like the so-called “time dilatation” with a fast moving object, e.g. a spaceship, the time should run more slowly than on an object resting against it, e.g. on the launch base of the spaceship. A well-known illustration of this phenomenon is the so-called twin paradox, according to which a twin is supposed to return younger from a stellar journey with a fast spaceship than its twin brother who has stayed on Earth.

Another consequence is the so-called “length contraction”. After that fast moving objects should be shortened compared to their “resting length”, distances should be shorter for fast moving objects than for resting objects. This has led to the development of a popular motif in science fiction, in which spaceships could reach distant places in space within a human life on board, while hundreds or even thousands of years would have passed by on Earth in the meantime.

A third, less well-known consequence is the so-called “relativity of simultaneity”. According to this, for observers moving at different speeds, the sequence of observable events is to be arranged differently for each observer. In extreme cases, events that would be simultaneous for one observer could be uneven for the other, and even one event could occur before for one observer and after another.

These three consequences listed here are mutually dependent. The mathematical formulae of the Special Theory of Relativity are only consistent if all three properties occur together: if distances are shortened for a fast spacecraft, time has to pass more slowly on the spacecraft, and this in turn results in the “relativity of simultaneity”, i.e. for an observer on the spacecraft events, say for example a sequence of supernova eruptions at different places in the sky, in a different temporal sequence, or even in a different order than for an earth dweller. But mind you: not the pure perception of these events should appear in a different temporal sequence, no, the objective sequence of the events themselves should be different for different observers.

These alleged consequences are all wrong. In fact, they are all based on confusing observation effects with what is actually the case with an observed object.

It is not time on a spaceship that is slower, it seems to an observer. Not lengths at moving objects are contracted, but to an observer it only seems so. For different observers, events do not take place in different time series, but observers only observe events in different time series because they are subject to different observation conditions such as different distances to the events.

Time dilation, length contraction, relativity of simultaneity are observational effects that only have physical effects on the observer, not on the observed object!

Just as a human being in the distance is not really smaller, but only seems, just as a siren does not really change its frequency when an ambulance passes you, so nowhere does time go slower and never is anything shorter than it actually is, and events take place according to physical laws in an objective, temporal arrangement.

In Special Theory of Relativity, observation effects are confused with what is actually the case with an object of observation!

]]>presentation focus, which i am going to deliver in academy. ]]>

One of many of his gross errors is about the secondary system K’ traveling at speed, away from the stationary system K, and a wave (of light I guess?) is emitted from it. According to einstein, the wave would emit in a circle, and he throws at a reader Lorentz transformation, as his own and as a proof. However, when we actually look at the Lorentz transformation, and calculate it correctly, it turns out that the function produces an ellipse, not a circle, as “genius” claims.

What more one wants? The twins? If one twin travels through a space with the speed of light, all that will ever happen is that he will arrive back to the Earth VERY quickly. S/he won’t be any younger than her/his sibling.

By defeating the SR, his GR fails as well. To claim anything else is to admit stupidity. I am pointing my finger at greene as I find him especially pathetic, but hawking and the rest are equally undeserving of their doctorates.

]]>Scientists have measured that the space is stretching linearly, not in a curve, as onestone suggested. Scientists have measured speeds up to 2 times faster than the speed of light, onestone said the speed of light is max.

Dr. Nikola Tesla, the REAL genius of all times, said that onestone has no idea and he proved him wrong back then.

Yugoslav scientist Miodrag Pavkovic wrote a book “einstein’s relativity: scientific theory or an illusion, analysing onestone’s numbers, claims and mathematics and kicked the “genius” into the dust, showing where and how that “genius” made basic mathematical errors. He calculated that the Morley-Michelson experiment, and later on Miller, were flawed, and that they had omitted to include Doppler’s effect, which when included corrects the calculations and proves existence of “ether”, whatever that may be. And indeed, onestone admitted that without “ether” his ST, and GT by default, do not work. That is why he introduced the “ether” in form of “dark matter” back into the space.

Scientists have also discovered that black holes cannot exist, and they do not exist. L. Mersini-Houxton did that, and she is an avid onestone fan, so something must be wrong there.

As tony said above, the only thing that happens when one flies with the speed of light, or faster, is that they get somewhere – faster. The time is NOT a dimension. It is a concept. As such, we cannot compress it or speed it up. It does not really exist, being a concept. “relativity theories” are a conspiracy theory of lunatics and deranged psychopaths.

]]>